Email of 25 May 2006 to the Attorney-General for Victoria

Dear Sir,

Re: Hilda Zhang v The Royal Australian Chemical Institute Inc. (M76, M77, M129 and M130/2005)

I refer to both of the High Court’s orders of above matter made on 10 May and the reasons for the orders, which were not available until 19 May.

The High Court did not doubt that our challenges to the Full Federal Court’s judgments were about all workers’ fundamental constitutional rights, did not doubt that the case laws made by the Full Federal Courts were wrong and did not doubt that if the High Court had heard our appeals we would have won. However, the High Court held to the effect that workers’ rights were nothing (not “sufficient to justify a grant of special leave to appeal”) comparing to the employers’ absolute right to give any directions to employees because “A reasonable time has elapsed since the s 78B notices were given. No Attorney-General has indicated a desire to intervene”, even though the High Court knew that 600 people had supported and signed the petitions against the case law made by the Full Federal Court. Arguments in detail can be found at our website: http://www.upholding-peoples-rights.blogspot.com.

Please clarify whether Your Honour concede: as “[a] reasonable time has elapsed since the s 78B notices were given” and Your Honour has not responded to Hilda’s Notices, the High Court has correctly understood Your Honour’s desire: not intervening in the matter in the High Court at all, because I will raise this matter to the members of the parliament.

I look forward to hearing from Your Honour.

Your Honours faithfully

Daming He

(file below is downloadable as .doc file)

My emails of both 21 April and 5 May 2006 to the Attorney-General for Victoria

(file below is downloadable as .jpg file)

Letter of 23 August 2006 from Deputy Victorian Government Solicitor